Page 160 - Profile's Unit Trusts and Collective Investments 2021 issue 2
P. 160

CHAPTER 8

                                                    For South Africans, feeder funds are often
                  Exchange Traded Fund           the easiest and most cost-effective way to get
                  An Exchange Traded Fund (or ETF)isa  offshore exposure – the investor can make a
                  fund which tracks an index but which  local  investment,  denominated  in  rands,
                  can be traded on a securities exchange  without having to transfer money overseas or
         like a share. This allows investors to buy ETFs  apply for a tax clearance. The costs associated
         through a stockbroker, although some ETFs can also  with feeder funds are often lower than those of
         issue units or shares directly. Relatively niche  offshore investments, especially where currency
         products ten years ago, ETFs are now a major – and  conversion charges are taken into account.
         booming – investment category. Recently passive
         funds in the USA have dominated investor interest,  One of the possible disadvantages of using a
         soaking up the lion’s share of inflows.  feeder fund to get offshore exposure is that
                                                 capital gains tax might be higher. This is
                                                 because of the way CGT is calculated for
                                                 offshore investments. With a feeder fund, CGT
                  Exchange Traded Notes          is paid on the gain in rands (ie, effectively
                  (ETNs)
                                                 including currency gains). With an offshore
                  Like an ETF, an Exchange Traded Note  investment, however, CGT is paid on the
                  (ETN) is an Exchange Traded Product  foreign currency gain translated into rands at
         (ETP). From the investor’s point of view, an ETN  the time of sale. Given the tendency of the rand
         looks very much like an ETF: it typically tracks an  to weaken against major currencies over the
         index, forex rate or commodity price, and it can be
         traded on the stock exchange like a share. The key  long term, this can mean a substantial CGT
         difference between ETFs and ETNs is that with ETNs  difference. For example, an investment of
         the underlying assets do not belong to the investors.  US$1,000 at R14/$ redeemed two years later
         Technically, an ETN is not a collective investment  with a 20% capital gain with the exchange rate
         scheme but a debt instrument – a promise made by  having risen to R18/$ would mean, at the
         an underwriting bank to pay to the holder of the ETN  maximum rate for individuals, R1,368 in CGT
         an amount equivalent to the movement in the  via the feeder fund, but only R648 in CGT via an
         reference index, rate or price, less fees. ETNs are  offshore investment (ie, money transferred
         therefore subject to credit risk (ie, the risk of default).  overseas). Note that this would turn into a
         A major advantage of ETNs is that they offer retail  disadvantage if the rand strengthened over the
         investors access to otherwise inaccessible asset  investment period.
         categories (such as specific commodities and
         frontier markets). They also offer a low tracking error  Multi-Manager Funds
         (ie, the issuer undertakes to match the movement in
         the underlying security, so that before the deduction  The multi-manager fund is another fund
         of fees the tracking error is zero).    “concept” which transcends the ASISA sectors.
                                                 Multi-management is about the way in which a
         fund is managed rather than the type of assets in which it invests (the latter being the basis of the
         ASISA classification).
            In the early days of unit trusts each fund had its own fund manager. This “single fund manager”
         concept is still the most common management structure today.
            Obviously the single fund manager does not work in isolation, but has a support team at the
         management company, which may include fundamental, technical and quantitative analysts. Some
         management companies use a team approach to manage their funds. In this case no single fund
         manager is entirely responsible for one fund. Instead, decisions about asset allocation are made by an
         investment committee. Either way, both individual fund managers and investment committees tend to
         have a particular investment “style”.
            The multi-manager concept grows out of the belief that the investment styles of particular
         managers or investment committees are not equally effective under all market conditions. The
         particular style of one investment house may produce relatively good performances in a bear market,
         while the style of another may produce above average returns in a bull market. Or one style may
         excel when bond markets are running, and another when offshore markets are doing well.
            The multi-manager fund tries to capitalise on these different strengths by outsourcing the
         management of the fund to two or more complementary managers or investment houses.



         158                     Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments — Understanding Unit Trusts
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165