Page 76 - Profile's Unit Trusts and Collective Investments 2021 issue 2
P. 76

CHAPTER 3

         of more technical issues which impact on investment
         performance and how it is presented. These include:  What is an index?
              Performance figures may be presented as absolute
                                                        In the financial markets, an
              returns, average annual returns (compounded or  index is a calculated value
              not), or even rolling annual returns      designed to show the trend
              The costs associated with unit trust investment  (or the average) of a group of securities
              may be either included or excluded (although the  or commodities. A simple stock market
              industry standard is NAV-to-NAV figures)  index, for example, could be constructed
                                                        by averaging all the share prices every
              Lump sum and monthly investments require
                                                        day. Plotting these averages would
              different treatment to enable fair “like with like”
              comparisons                               reveal the ‘average’ trend of prices. This
                                                        would be skewed towards high-priced
              Different methods for calculating the reinvestment  shares, however, so more sophisticated
              of dividends and interest may be used     indexes use values weighted by market
              Comparable calendar periods must be used when  capitlisation. Indices vary enormously in
              comparing the performances of different funds  breadth. The JSE Top40 index, for
                                                        example, is made up of the 40 largest
              Where a benchmark is used, the benchmark must
                                                        shares on the JSE; the MSCI World
              be applied consistently and must be appropriate to  Index, by contrast, includes over1650
              the particular fund
                                                        shares across 22 developed markets.
         Trailing, Rolling, Discreet and CAGR
            In the ideal world, all performance figures would be expressed in a standardised and universal
         way, making it possible to compare rates of return across a range of products notwithstanding
         different fee structures and investing strategies. Many regulations around performance reporting
         are designed to achieve this, but advisors and investors still need to be aware that there are several
         valid ways of showing investment returns.
            The methods used by fund managers and web sites include trailing returns, discrete returns and
         rolling returns, all of which could show either total (cumulative) or annualised performance figures
         where periods are not 12 months (see Total vs Annual Returns on page 70). All have their pros and cons.
            Many stats houses, including ProfileData, use compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) as their
         main performance metric, mainly because these are comparable across a wide range of scenarios. It
         also makes rates of return somewhat comparable to interest rates on risk-free products.
            For lump sum investments, CAGR is compounded annually (and is therefore comparable to the
         effective annual rate for fixed interest products). For monthly annuity performance figures, we
         report an annual growth rate compounded monthly (this is logical where contributions are made
         monthly). In other words, a performance figure of 10% achieved via a monthly debit into an equity
         fund means that, to get the same return, an investor needed an interest rate of 10% per annum
         (paid monthly in arrears).
            Absolute returns are harder to compare across different scenarios (eg, where calendar periods
         are not the same). For example, imagine adverts from two different funds, the one reporting 70%
         growth over 5 years, the other 41% growth over 3 years. It’s not immediately obvious which did
         better. Using CAGR we see that the 70% growth is the equivalent of 11.2% a year, 40% the
         equivalent of 12.1%, making it clear which fund performed better on an annualised basis.
         (Of course, this comparison is not fair because the time periods are different, but it illustrates why
         CAGR can be easier to interpret.)
            To illustrate the relationship between the different performance tables that are encountered
         online, chart 3.7 shows trailing, discrete and rolling returns calculated over three years for the
         same fund.

         Benchmarks
            A benchmark is a standard or point of reference against which something can be judged. In
         the collective investments industry, typical benchmarks are stock indices, sector averages,
         inflation and interest rates.


         74                      Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments — Understanding Unit Trusts
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81